Friday, November 07, 2008

Criminalizing of Dissent: Defend the RNC 8!

Unfinished Business

Sorry to have to remind you all of some of the bad stuff that happened a couple months ago during the RNC (and for interrupting the better mood and additional hopefulness many of us find ourselves having post-election), but there’s an important reason.

If you haven’t seen the just released movie “Terrorizing Dissent”, please take two minutes to at least watch the trailer. (The full movie can also be watched on-line.) The juxtaposition of McCain’s phoney speech-making inside the Republican National Convention with the violent reality unfolding outside is quite eye-opening, isn’t it? (The fact that TV and other media only carried what went on inside the RNC and not outside contributed to creating the public approval “bump” for the Republican ticket—certainly not unexpected following such televised extravagant displays but which was critical in 2008 for McCain-Palin to have any chance after Bush’s eight disastrous years.)

I know many of you who did not participate in the various activities held at the time of the 2008 Republican National Convention (Aug 31- Sept 4) and who did not witness it first hand, may have a hard time believing what an awful combat zone St. Paul was turned into much of the time that week; how pre-emptive raids effectively criminalized dissent; how community police were turned into militarized, dehumanized (and non-identifiable) robo-cops, equipped with tasers, pepper spray and tear gas; and then (unsurprisingly) pushed to over-react and use their chemical weapons and arrest over 800 non-violent citizens, including 40 some journalists. (For more, see this great article by William Cox on the “Professional Policing of Protest” issues here; Democracy Now interview of National Lawyers Guild Attorney Bruce Nestor and myself; and “Storm Troopers at the RNC” by Ray McGovern.)

All kinds of irregularities and bad departures from St. Paul’s community policing model occurred. And the more we learn about the heavy-handed involvement of the Twin Cities’ two (Republican) Sheriffs: Ramsey County Sheriff Fletcher (whose deputies were convicted of corruption the week right before the RNC as a result of an FBI sting investigation) and Hennepin County Sheriff Richard Stanek (a McCain Campaign Co-Chairman), as well as diffusion of responsibility amongst a number of federal agencies, the more likely it appears these repressive police actions could have been politically motivated—deliberately intended to intimidate citizens from exercising their first amendment rights and to convey a false impression to the larger American public of little widespread opposition to the right-wing policies being promoted at the RNC.

Unfortunately the intimidation did work, scaring thousands away from protesting and other activities in St. Paul that week. Watching the surreal scenes that unfolded outside the RNC, it’s amazing any of us citizens had the courage to try, isn’t it? In fact our little Peace Island Picnic group was only a block away from Mickey’s Diner on Tuesday night, Sept 2nd (having just left the St. Paul “Free Speech Stage” outside the RNC) when police over reacted and shot their chemical weapons into the people on the street.

Help Defend the RNC 8!
Sign the Petition to Dismiss Charges

If you’re like me, you’ve probably signed hundreds of petitions in the last few years but I believe this one can really impact the situation because it’s focused on one individual (Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner) who possesses the legal wisdom to recognize the wrongfulness in proceeding with a criminal prosecution of this sort that would set dangerous precedent—dangerous to constitutional rights because it would broaden terrorism to include mere property damage instead of acts dangerous to human life (a provision of the Minnesota Patriot Act that Richard Stanek himself was responsible for pushing through the Minnesota’s legislature after 9-11 when he was the Republican leader of the Minnesota Senate) and blurring terrorism with what was, at most, acts of intended civil disobedience. Most noteworthy is the fact that, once this plan of smearing protesters as terrorists succeeded at the RNC, Republicans carried their McCarthy like tactics a step further, and tried it with Obama himself, alleging that he had “palled with terrorists.” That’s when their bluff was called. But it was too late for the RNC 8 who were already charged with “conspiracy to riot in furtherance of terrorism”.

A lot of people from all over the country have already signed the petition but we need thousands more (including you!) to sign it to have a better chance of arguing the charges ought to be dismissed against the eight young people that have become known as the “RNC 8”. So please sign the petition and then send it on to others you know who might sign. Also we are trying to get names of people that the District Attorney might recognize as carrying special weight due to their past accomplishments or experience. So if for example, you’re a retired judge or law enforcement officer or government leader or something like that, please email me and let me know you’ve signed so we can highlight your signature when the petition is finally presented.

In case any of you forgot these last few years, dissent IS patriotic. Protest should not be confused with terrorism because as Thomas Jefferson said a bunch of times in different ways, “Dissent is patriotic!”

Al Franken's Deficit Is 236 Votes!

Al Franken is within .011 percentage points of Republican U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman.

Real life stranger than fiction! Except for a comedy genius like Franken himself, no one could imagine a more dramatic, darkly humorous last scene that continues to unfold. Saturday Night Live was never this weird! The simple and ideal solution would be to hold a new run-off election.

This is unbelievable—my nightmare of not having worked hard enough and losing by one vote—has unfortunately come true!

Earlier Coleman had declared victory and suggested that Franken should waive a recount. But Coleman kept to himself on Thursday, while Franken called reporters to talk about the prospects for a continued narrowing of the count:
Coleman said there was no reason for a recount, that there would be no movement. But you see that [his lead] has more than halved and the recount hasn't even started. This election will be decided by the voters, not by the candidates.
Determination of voter intent is what it's all about. Look at this:

Crazy outcome may top 'em all

In the 1974 New Hampshire race, both candidates were declared the winner, and the seat was also declared vacant before a revote.